free investment advice logo

Here's the deal: You may read the information on the site for free. As and when I have the time I'll add new articles, taking into account any questions which have been asked. For legal reasons, please do not consider anything on this site to be advice - the only free investment advice is to apply your own mind. If you want to request that an article be written, then email me. I have limited time available, and will prioritise the work accordingly, so please be patient. Email me at


Retirement proposal is discriminatory & regressive

leave a comment

20 March 2013. It's a massive sacrifice for somebody who is earning R200,000 to save 50% of that for retirement; but if he is really desperate to save for a decent retirement, why shouldn't he enjoy just as much of a tax break as somebody earning far more? To do anything other than giving lower earners at least as much of a tax break as higher earners is discriminatory in a regressive manner.

The proposal

In the 2013 retirement reform proposals from National Treasury it is suggested that individuals contributing to retirement funds receive a tax deduction of 27.5% of the greater of remuneration & taxable income, with a ceiling of R350,000. This discriminates against lower income earners and somebody needs to speak out about it.

Tax breaks

It's quite simple to see the discrimination against lower earners - somebody earning R100,000 only gets a tax break of R27,500 whereas somebody earning R1m gets a tax break of R275,000.


Tax Break





Regressive tax system

This is what's known as a regressive tax system, where you give larger tax breaks to the rich than to the poor.

Counter proposal

Let's give poor people just as much incentive to save big for retirement as the rich. The way this could be done is by setting a fixed Rand amount which anybody can contribute to retirement funds in a fully tax deductible manner, regardless of how little they earn. For example this could be pitched at a level of R200,000. This is simpler and more equitable than the current proposal.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Due to regulations, our emails and this entire website should be considered as having been set up for entertainment purposes alone. Expect errors and omissions. Investment in shares and other financial instruments should be conducted by professional investment experts only. Any use of the information on my websites, emails and newsletters is at your own risk, and by using it you agree that the owners of our websites, authors and associated parties wont be held liable for any losses suffered as a result of using the information. None of the information should be construed as being advice. Our newsletters, articles, discussions and website are not an offering for any investment. It represents only our and others' opinions. Any views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as an offer, an endorsement, or inducement to invest. Illustrations, forecasts or hypothetical data are not guaranteed and are provided for illustrative purposes only. There are risks involved in buying or selling a financial product. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Any investment values given are not guaranteed. Investment returns can be volatile. When investing there is always the risk of losing all or a substantial amount of your investment, as well as the risk of illiquidity. There may be advertisements on some pages on this website, and we may earn income from these advertisements. We may earn commission on products invested in or annuities purchased. We cannot attest to the accuracy of the material presented here, and opinions expressed may be changed without prior notice. In any event our liability will be limited to R1, and any court cases must take place in Cape Town. You may contact us at